The Public Authority Algorithmic and Automated Decision-Making Systems Bill was introduced in the House of Lords, aiming to regulate the use of automated and algorithmic decision-making tools within the UK public sector. As the reliance on these systems grows, the bill seeks to ensure their use is responsible, fair, and transparent, with a focus on protecting individual rights and public trust.
One of the bill’s key provisions is the requirement for public authorities to complete Algorithmic Impact Assessments before deploying any automated systems. These assessments are designed to evaluate the potential risks and benefits of such systems, particularly regarding fairness, privacy, and compliance with laws like the Equality Act and the Human Rights Act of 1998. Authorities are also required to update these assessments whenever significant changes occur in the system’s functionality, ensuring that decisions remain lawful and ethical.
In addition to the impact assessments, the bill mandates the creation of Algorithmic Transparency Records. These records must be published before the use or procurement of automated decision-making tools, providing the public with information about the rationale for using the system, its technical specifications, and the oversight mechanisms in place. This transparency aims to build public trust by explaining how these systems function and how they affect citizens’ lives.
The bill also requires public authorities to notify individuals when decisions are being made by automated systems and to provide explanations for how these decisions are reached. This ensures that citizens understand the decision-making processes that impact them, allowing for greater transparency and accountability. Furthermore, the bill prohibits the procurement of algorithmic systems that cannot be fully scrutinized. This prevents public authorities from using “black-box” systems, where the decision-making process is hidden due to technical or proprietary reasons. Vendors must disclose detailed documentation and submit their systems for evaluation by the AI Safety Institute, ensuring that the algorithms are accurate, safe, and free from bias.
To protect individuals affected by algorithmic decisions, the bill establishes an independent dispute resolution service. This service provides a means for individuals to challenge or seek redress for decisions made by automated systems, ensuring that these tools remain accountable to the public. Additionally, the bill requires public authorities to train employees in how to monitor and challenge algorithmic outputs. This human oversight is essential to ensure that algorithms are not making unchecked decisions, and that employees can intervene when necessary. The bill also mandates that systems include logging capabilities to record events during operation, with these logs being retained for a minimum of five years to ensure accountability.
The bill emphasizes principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability, requiring public authorities to respect human rights and uphold democratic values when using AI-driven systems. It encourages responsible innovation through regular audits and evaluations to address risks such as bias, privacy violations, and discrimination. By requiring ongoing assessments and transparency, the bill aims to strike a balance between technological advancement and the protection of citizens’ rights.
If passed, the bill will take effect six months after becoming law and will apply to all public authorities in England and Wales, except in cases involving national security. The full text of the bill, along with related regulations, will be open for public review and comment in the coming months.
Need Help?
If you’re concerned or have questions about how to navigate the global AI regulatory landscape, don’t hesitate to reach out to BABL AI. Their Audit Experts can offer valuable insight and ensure you’re informed and compliant.
