UPDATE — AUGUST 2025: The UK’s Public Authority (Algorithmic and Automated Decision-Making Systems) Bill, introduced in the House of Lords in March 2024, has not advanced beyond its First Reading and remains stalled as of August 2025. While the bill proposed mandatory impact assessments, transparency records, and an independent dispute mechanism, the government has instead pursued a non-statutory, “pro-innovation” AI framework led by existing regulators and the new AI Safety Institute. Many of the bill’s themes are being addressed through regulatory guidance, but they have not been enacted into law.
ORIGINAL NEWS STORY:
UK Parliament Introduces Public Authority Algorithmic and Automated Decision-Making Tools Bill to Regulate AI in Public Sector
The Public Authority Algorithmic and Automated Decision-Making Systems Bill was introduced in the House of Lords, aiming to regulate the use of automated and algorithmic decision-making tools within the UK public sector. As the reliance on these systems grows, the bill seeks to ensure their use is responsible, fair, and transparent, with a focus on protecting individual rights and public trust.
Algorithmic Impact Assessments
One of the bill’s core provisions requires public authorities to complete Algorithmic Impact Assessments before deploying any automated systems. These assessments evaluate potential risks and benefits, focusing on fairness, privacy, and compliance with laws such as the Equality Act and the Human Rights Act of 1998. Authorities must also update these assessments whenever major system changes occur, ensuring that algorithms continue to meet ethical and legal standards.
Algorithmic Transparency Records
The legislation mandates Algorithmic Transparency Records for all automated decision-making tools. These records must be published before a system is used or purchased. They must explain the reasons for adoption, outline technical details, and describe the oversight mechanisms in place. By making this information public, the bill seeks to build trust and help citizens understand how AI systems influence their daily lives.
Public Notification and Human Oversight
The bill also requires public authorities to notify individuals whenever automated systems make decisions that affect them. Authorities must provide clear explanations of how those decisions were reached. To prevent opaque “black-box” systems, the bill prohibits procuring technologies that cannot be independently examined. Vendors must share full documentation and allow the AI Safety Institute to evaluate their algorithms for accuracy, safety, and bias.
Dispute Resolution and Staff Training
To protect individuals’ rights, the bill establishes an independent dispute resolution service that allows people to challenge or appeal automated decisions. It also mandates employee training on how to monitor and question algorithmic outcomes. Every system must include event logs, which must be stored for at least five years to ensure accountability.
Ensuring Fairness and Accountability
The bill’s overarching principles are fairness, transparency, and respect for human rights. It promotes responsible innovation through regular audits and evaluations designed to reduce risks such as bias and discrimination. If passed, the law would take effect six months after Royal Assent. It would apply to all public authorities in England and Wales, excluding national security cases. The full bill and related regulations will soon be open for public review and comment.
Need Help?
If you’re concerned or have questions about how to navigate the global AI regulatory landscape, reach out to BABL AI. Their Audit Experts can offer valuable insight and ensure you’re informed and compliant.
