A new report from the Partnership on AI (PAI) has raised concerns about the growing patchwork of frameworks addressing AI documentation, which could lead to fragmentation if not properly coordinated. The report, titled “Policy Alignment on AI Transparency: Analyzing Interoperability of Documentation Requirements Across Eight Frameworks,” focuses on interoperability challenges between documentation requirements in the U.S., EU, UK, and several multilateral initiatives. As AI systems increasingly power critical sectors, ensuring consistent and interoperable documentation practices is vital to safeguard transparency, accountability, and public trust in these systems.
Why Documentation Matters
Documentation gives regulators, developers, auditors, and the public the information needed to understand how AI systems function. Artifacts such as model cards, technical specifications, and incident reports reveal how models were built, trained, and deployed. They also help identify safety issues, fairness concerns, and reliability gaps. PAI notes that consistent documentation allows stakeholders to evaluate AI risks in a structured way. Without alignment across jurisdictions, comparing systems becomes harder and regulatory oversight becomes uneven. This inconsistency may leave some regions more exposed to misuse or system failures.
What the Analysis Found
PAI reviewed eight major frameworks, including the EU AI Act, the U.S. Executive Order on AI, the UK AI White Paper, and multilateral initiatives such as the Hiroshima AI Process and OECD AI Principles. While each emphasizes the importance of documentation, the report finds little agreement on what those requirements should contain or how they should be structured. The EU AI Act offers the most detailed guidance, especially for general-purpose AI models and high-risk systems. Its rules cover model capabilities, training data, and safety protections. Other frameworks, like the U.S. NIST AI Risk Management Framework, provide flexible recommendations and leave many specifics to industry judgment.
This lack of alignment poses challenges for companies that work across borders. According to PAI, developers could face a future where one AI system requires multiple, incompatible documentation packages for different markets. That scenario would increase compliance burdens and weaken global efforts to ensure AI safety and trustworthiness.
Areas for Better Global Alignment
PAI encourages stronger collaboration among governments, industry, academia, and civil society. The report highlights several key areas where coordination could help:
- Standardizing Documentation Artifacts: PAI calls for global standards for model cards, technical documentation, and similar records. Shared expectations would allow regulators and auditors to evaluate AI systems more consistently.
- Harmonizing Foundation Models Policies: Foundation models serve as the backbone for many applications. Because of their broad impact, PAI argues that consistent documentation for these models is critical.
- Including the Global South: PAI stresses that many existing frameworks reflect priorities from the Global North. Countries in the Global South need to be part of standardization efforts to ensure documentation norms reflect diverse contexts and infrastructure challenges.
- Leveraging Multilateral Agreements: International initiatives—such as the G7 Hiroshima AI Process and the OECD AI Principles—already promote coordination on AI governance. PAI suggests expanding their focus to include documentation standards, which could advance global interoperability.
Need Help?
Keeping track of the everchanging AI landscape can be tough, especially if you have questions and concerns about how it will impact you. Don’t hesitate to reach out to BABL AI. Their Audit Experts are ready to provide valuable assistance.
