Germany has released one of the most detailed and practical frameworks yet for testing the use of artificial intelligence in financial services, offering a blueprint for how banks, insurers, and fintech firms can evaluate AI systems responsibly across the financial sector.
Published in May 2025 by the German Federal Ministry of Finance (Bundesministerium der Finanzen, BMF), the document—titled “AI and Finance: Evaluation and Testing Criteria”—was developed in partnership with the Plattform Lernende Systeme and Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems (IAIS). It reflects Germany’s growing ambition to shape the governance of AI in high-risk sectors by linking emerging European regulatory standards to technical best practices.
“This paper serves as a contribution to the implementation of the [EU] AI Act by supporting the establishment of testing and evaluation criteria and procedures,” the document states.
The report is not a binding regulation but is intended to assist market actors in preparing for future compliance. It explicitly addresses the coming obligations of the EU AI Act—particularly its provisions for “high-risk AI systems” in the financial domain—and encourages companies to proactively adopt testing protocols in line with European and international standards.
The framework proposes six categories of evaluation criteria: performance, robustness, fairness, explainability, compliance, and consumer protection. Each dimension is supplemented by sample test procedures, including quantitative and qualitative methods, and is aligned with established international standards such as ISO/IEC 24028 (AI Trustworthiness) and ISO/IEC 22989 (AI Concepts and Terminology).
- Performance criteria address accuracy, reliability, and generalization across real-world data conditions.
- Robustness involves testing resilience to data drift, adversarial attacks, and system failure.
- Fairness assesses disparate impact across demographic groups and transparency in training data.
- Explainability focuses on model interpretability for internal audit and end-user understanding.
- Compliance ensures alignment with sector-specific regulation, including consumer lending, AML, and insurance pricing.
- Consumer Protection examines the effects of AI decision-making on customers, especially regarding transparency, recourse, and the risk of manipulation.
The document provides illustrative workflows and testing strategies for different types of financial applications—from credit scoring and algorithmic trading to automated claims handling and robo-advising. It emphasizes that testing should not be a one-time event but an ongoing lifecycle process integrated into risk management and model governance functions.
The authors also highlight the need for independent third-party testing in some high-risk contexts, echoing the EU AI Act’s emphasis on conformity assessment bodies.
Need Help?
If you’re concerned or have questions about how to navigate the Germany’s AI frameworks or the global AI regulatory landscape, don’t hesitate to reach out to BABL AI. Their Audit Experts can offer valuable insight and ensure you’re informed and compliant.
