The Supreme Court of Singapore issued “Registrar’s Circular No. 1 of 2024,” which introduces a groundbreaking guide on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools by court users. The “Guide on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools by Court Users” (the “Guide”) establishes a set of principles and expectations for the application of AI technologies in the preparation and submission of court documents. This development reflects the court’s recognition of the growing use of AI in legal practices and aims to balance innovation with responsibility and accuracy in court submissions.
Scope and Purpose of the Guide
Effective October 1, 2024, the Guide applies to all matters within the Supreme Court, State Courts, and Family Justice Courts, including the Small Claims Tribunals, Employment Claims Tribunals, and Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals. It provides practical guidance for lawyers, self-represented litigants, and other court users who may rely on AI tools during document preparation. Rather than restricting the technology, the Court adopts a neutral stance. It allows AI tools to assist with drafting court materials, as long as users take full responsibility for their accuracy and appropriateness. The Guide defines generative AI as software that produces new content—such as text, images, or audio—based on user prompts. However, it distinguishes these tools from simpler grammar or spelling correctors.
Accuracy, Verification, and Responsibility
The Guide emphasizes accuracy and verification as central duties for anyone using generative AI. Lawyers and self-represented parties must confirm that all statements submitted to the court are true, factual, and independently verified. AI tools may not be used to fabricate or manipulate evidence. For example, an AI system can help draft a preliminary version of an affidavit, but users must ensure every fact presented is correct. Court users are also responsible for ensuring that AI-generated content does not infringe intellectual property rights and that all cited material is properly attributed. They must safeguard personal and sensitive data, complying with laws on privacy, confidentiality, and legal privilege when interacting with AI systems.
Disclosure and Fact-Checking Requirements
While the Court does not require users to declare AI use in advance, it expects them to disclose and explain AI-generated content if asked. Such requests may occur when questions arise about the authenticity or accuracy of a document. The Guide warns of overreliance on AI tools, noting that systems can “hallucinate” or produce fabricated information. Because AI models cannot evaluate whether their output is legally correct, all AI-generated material must undergo manual fact-checking. The Court reminds users that AI cannot replace traditional legal research or professional judgment.
Ensuring Legal Integrity and Confidentiality
To preserve the integrity of court documents, the Guide advises users to cross-check all case citations and legal references against trusted sources such as the Singapore Statutes Online or the eLitigation GD Viewer. Depending solely on AI to verify legal content is insufficient. Finally, the Guide reiterates that confidential or restricted materials obtained through court orders must remain protected. Sharing or reusing this information for unrelated purposes violates both legal and ethical standards.
A Balanced Approach to AI in Law
Through this new Guide, the Supreme Court of Singapore acknowledges the growing role of AI in modern legal practice while maintaining strict safeguards to protect the judicial process. By emphasizing responsibility, transparency, and human oversight, the Court aims to encourage innovation without compromising the credibility of court proceedings.
Need Help?
If you’re wondering how Singapore’s AI guidelines, or any other AI strategies and laws worldwide could impact you and your business, don’t hesitate to reach out to BABL AI. Their Audit Experts can address your concerns and questions while offering valuable insights.
