As the UK grapples with financial pressures in its public services, a new report from the Ada Lovelace Institute highlights the critical role of artificial intelligence (AI) procurement in transforming public services. The report, titled “Buying AI: Is the public sector equipped to procure technology in the public interest?,” examines how local government can harness AI to improve service delivery while ensuring that ethical considerations remain central to this transformation.
Released in September 2024, the report outlines the potential for AI to address longstanding challenges in the public sector, including strained resources and rising demand for services like social care and healthcare. With many councils facing financial pressures, the report emphasizes the need for local authorities to carefully assess the procurement of AI technologies to maximize their benefits while minimizing potential risks.
The UK government has shown increasing interest in leveraging AI to improve public service delivery, especially in areas like welfare, education, and healthcare. The report notes that AI holds promise for creating efficiencies, reducing administrative burdens, and helping local authorities manage limited resources. However, the report warns that the adoption of AI must be approached with caution to avoid risks such as biased decision-making and breaches of privacy.
According to the report, AI’s potential lies in its ability to streamline processes like predictive analytics and automated decision-making. However, the Ada Lovelace Institute cautions that such technologies should be procured with a focus on transparency, fairness, and public benefit. The report emphasizes that while AI can make public services more efficient, there must be robust safeguards to ensure that these technologies do not harm vulnerable populations or perpetuate existing inequalities.
One of the key findings in the report is that local authorities often face challenges in navigating the complex landscape of AI procurement. The analysis highlights a lack of clear guidance from central government on how to integrate ethical considerations, such as fairness and transparency, into AI procurement processes. This can result in inconsistencies and difficulties for procurement teams tasked with evaluating the societal impact of AI technologies.
The report identifies five major themes that should guide AI procurement: transparency, fairness, public engagement, social value, and impact assessments. Despite the presence of various pieces of legislation and guidance, the report finds that local governments lack a cohesive framework for applying these principles during procurement. This absence of clear direction places a burden on local authorities to interpret and implement procurement guidelines effectively.
Additionally, the report underscores the need for greater collaboration between local authorities and private-sector technology providers. Since many AI systems are developed by private companies, ensuring that these systems align with public-sector values and priorities can be challenging. The report advocates for more robust processes that allow local authorities to hold technology providers accountable for the social impacts of their products.
To address these challenges, the Ada Lovelace Institute offers several recommendations aimed at improving the procurement of AI in the public sector. Among the key suggestions is the need for central government to streamline and clarify AI procurement guidance, making it easier for local authorities to integrate ethical considerations into their decision-making processes.
The report also calls for the development of an Algorithmic Impact Assessment Standard for local government use. This standard would help local authorities assess the potential societal impacts of AI technologies before they are deployed, ensuring that any risks to fairness and equity are identified and mitigated early in the process.
Moreover, the Ada Lovelace Institute emphasizes the importance of transparency throughout the procurement process. It suggests that local authorities should establish clear channels for public engagement, allowing communities to understand and provide input on the AI technologies that will affect their lives.
Need Help?
If you have questions or concerns about AI guidelines, regulations and laws, don’t hesitate to reach out to BABL AI. Their Audit Experts can offer valuable insight, and ensure you’re informed and compliant.
