As the UK grapples with financial pressures in its public services, a new report from the Ada Lovelace Institute highlights the critical role of artificial intelligence (AI) procurement in transforming public services. The report, titled “Buying AI: Is the public sector equipped to procure technology in the public interest?,” examines how local government can harness AI to improve service delivery while ensuring that ethical considerations remain central to this transformation.
Balancing AI Innovation With Ethical Governance
Released in September 2024, the report examines how AI could help public institutions manage rising demands and shrinking budgets. Many local councils are under severe financial pressure, prompting them to explore automation, predictive analytics, and digital tools to improve efficiency. The report acknowledges AI’s potential to transform healthcare, social care, and education but warns that unchecked adoption could create new risks. AI can streamline public administration, reduce workloads, and identify community needs more accurately. Yet, without oversight, it can also entrench bias and weaken data privacy protections. The Institute stresses that ethical considerations must remain at the center of AI procurement, particularly when decisions affect vulnerable populations.
Lack of Clear Guidance for Local Governments
The report reveals that local authorities face major obstacles when buying AI tools. Many lack consistent guidance from central government on how to evaluate ethical and social impacts. As a result, procurement teams often struggle to integrate principles such as fairness, transparency, and accountability into their processes. The Ada Lovelace Institute identifies five values that should guide AI procurement: transparency, fairness, public engagement, social value, and impact assessment. While some existing legislation touches on these principles, there is no unified framework to help local governments apply them in practice. This gap, the report argues, leaves each authority to interpret ethical standards on its own—often without the expertise or resources to do so effectively.
Strengthening Collaboration and Accountability
Another key concern is the relationship between public bodies and private technology providers. Because most AI systems are built by commercial companies, public agencies depend heavily on vendors for technical insight. The report calls for stronger mechanisms that hold these companies accountable for social outcomes, not just technical performance. The Institute urges the UK government to simplify and clarify national AI procurement rules. Clearer standards would help local councils purchase systems that reflect public-sector values and reduce the risk of harmful deployments.
Recommendations for Ethical AI Procurement
To improve accountability and protect citizens’ rights, the Ada Lovelace Institute proposes several measures. One is the creation of an Algorithmic Impact Assessment Standard tailored for local government. This framework would allow councils to assess societal risks—such as bias or exclusion—before implementing AI tools. Early evaluations could prevent misuse and build public confidence in digital decision-making.
The Institute also emphasizes the importance of public transparency. Local authorities should involve communities in discussions about new AI technologies, giving citizens the chance to understand, question, and influence how these systems are used. By combining clearer guidance, early risk assessments, and public engagement, the report concludes, the UK can adopt AI in ways that support innovation while protecting fairness and democratic accountability.
Need Help?
You might have questions or concerns about AI guidelines, regulations and laws. Therefore, don’t hesitate to reach out to BABL AI. Their Audit Experts can offer valuable insight, and ensure you’re informed and compliant.
