UPDATE — SEPTEMBER 2025:
Since the Council of Europe’s Committee on Artificial Intelligence first circulated the HUDERIA methodology in mid-2024, the framework has moved from draft to official reference status. In May 2025, the Committee formally endorsed HUDERIA as part of its toolkit to support the new Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence, Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law—the world’s first binding AI treaty, now in the ratification stage. By June and July 2025, HUDERIA was incorporated into the treaty’s implementation guidance. This effectively positions it as the recommended method for conducting risk and impact assessments under the convention.
Several governments and EU bodies, including Norway, Spain, and select agencies, have begun pilot applications of HUDERIA to test its stakeholder engagement and socio-technical risk analysis steps. These pilots are expected to inform refinements ahead of an updated version scheduled for early 2026. At the same time, the methodology is being mapped against international standards such as the OECD AI framework, ISO/IEC 42001, and the NIST AI RMF to ensure compatibility and avoid duplication, while keeping its distinct focus on human rights, democracy, and rule of law.
ORIGINAL NEWS STORY:
Council of Europe Introduces HUDERIA for AI Risk and Impact Assessments
The Council of Europe’s Committee on Artificial Intelligence has introduced a new methodology designed to assess risks linked to artificial intelligence systems. Known as HUDERIA, the framework focuses on protecting human rights, democracy, and the rule of law as AI becomes more widely deployed across society.
HUDERIA stands for Human Rights, Democracy, and Rule of Law Impact Assessment. It provides a structured way for governments, public bodies, and organizations to examine how AI systems may affect people and institutions. The methodology responds to growing concern that technical performance alone does not capture AI’s broader social and legal impact.
A Human Rights–Centered Approach to AI Governance
As AI systems increasingly shape public services, employment, and civic life, the Council of Europe has emphasized the need for governance tools that go beyond compliance checklists. HUDERIA aims to bridge technical risk analysis with legal and ethical safeguards.
The methodology builds on work by the Council of Europe’s Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence. It also draws from international standards and guidance developed by bodies such as ISO, the OECD, and NIST. While HUDERIA is voluntary, it complements binding frameworks like the EU AI Act by focusing explicitly on societal harm.
How the HUDERIA Methodology Works
HUDERIA is structured around four connected stages that guide organizations through a full assessment process.
- Context-Based Risk Analysis: The first stage examines how and where an AI system will be used. It looks at social, legal, and technical contexts to determine whether the system is appropriate for deployment in the first place.
- Stakeholder Engagement Process: Next, the methodology calls for meaningful consultation. This step ensures that people and groups affected by an AI system can provide input, particularly where systems may impact rights or access to services.
- Risk and Impact Assessment: At this stage, organizations assess potential harms in detail. The analysis focuses on severity, likelihood, and scope, helping decision-makers understand which risks require urgent attention.
- Mitigation Plan: Finally, HUDERIA requires a clear plan to address identified risks. This includes governance measures, monitoring practices, and accountability mechanisms that apply throughout the AI system’s lifecycle.
Socio-Technical and Iterative Design
A core feature of HUDERIA is its socio-technical perspective. Rather than treating AI as a neutral tool, the framework recognizes how systems interact with institutions, incentives, and social structures.
In addition, HUDERIA is designed to be iterative. Organizations are expected to revisit assessments as systems evolve, data changes, or deployment contexts shift. This approach reflects the reality that AI risks can grow or change over time.
Emphasis on Inclusion and Equity
Stakeholder engagement plays a central role in the methodology. HUDERIA encourages the inclusion of marginalized and at-risk groups, aiming to reduce discriminatory outcomes and power imbalances.
By embedding participation into risk assessment, the framework seeks to strengthen trust and legitimacy in AI decision-making.
Position Within Global AI Governance
Although non-binding, HUDERIA aligns closely with international efforts to promote responsible AI. Its focus on rights, democracy, and legal safeguards distinguishes it from more technical risk frameworks.
Also, for policymakers and organizations navigating multiple AI governance regimes, HUDERIA offers a values-driven blueprint that complements existing standards without duplicating them.
Need Help?
If you have questions or concerns about any global guidelines, regulations and laws, don’t hesitate to reach out to BABL AI. Therefore, their Audit Experts can offer valuable insight, and ensure you’re informed and compliant.
