What is the impact of New York State’s Latest AI Initiative?

Written by Jeremy Werner

Jeremy is an experienced journalist, skilled communicator, and constant learner with a passion for storytelling and a track record of crafting compelling narratives. He has a diverse background in broadcast journalism, AI, public relations, data science, and social media management.
Posted on 01/25/2024
In Blog

New York’s NYS-P24-001: A Blueprint for Ethical AI Policy Use in Government

 

The New York State Information Technology Policy NYS-P24-001, also known as the “Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies,” was announced early in 2024. It establishes comprehensive New York AI policy guidelines for state entities to ethically and responsibly adopt AI systems, but how comprehensive is it?

 

Modeled in part on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, the policy aims to balance innovation and efficiency with privacy, accountability, and public trust. Its scope includes all public-facing AI systems, ensuring that advanced technologies serve the public without compromising rights or ethical standards.

Core Requirements for State Agencies

Under the policy, AI integration is permitted only with robust safeguards in place. Key mandates include:

  • Human oversight of all AI-generated decisions affecting the public

  • Routine audits of AI system outputs, decision-making methodologies, and governance processes

  • Comprehensive AI risk assessments addressing privacy, security, fairness, and compliance

  • Strict data protection protocols, including minimization, retention limits, accuracy validation, and transparency for data subjects

  • Alignment with cybersecurity standards, such as encryption and access control

  • Demonstrated algorithmic fairness, explainability, and equity in outcomes

  • Appointment of an Information Owner for each system, with legal and ethical review prior to adoption

  • Public disclosure when AI systems directly interact with citizens

  • Mandatory inventory and registration of all in-scope AI systems, with a 180-day reporting requirement for new systems

  • Formal exception process for non-compliance with mandatory guidelines

Furthermore, these requirements are designed to ensure that AI systems serve human-centric outcomes and that government agencies remain accountable for their impact.

Why It Matters

With more state agencies adopting powerful AI tools, the risks of algorithmic bias, privacy violations, and opaque decision-making have grown. NYS-P24-001 stands out by requiring explainability and ethical review, anchoring trust in public services. It serves as a model for other governments and public institutions exploring AI integration.

However, the policy’s emphasis on risk-based governance, human oversight, and public transparency reflects a mature approach to managing AI in the public interest.

Looking Ahead

As other states like Maryland, Virginia, and California explore or implement their own AI governance measures, New York’s early leadership on ethical AI policy adoption provides a tested roadmap.

If you have questions about the AI landscape, contact BABL AI, their team of Audit Experts will offer valuable insight.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Keep up with the latest on BABL AI, AI Auditing and
AI Governance News by subscribing to our news letter